« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: P&H v2  (Read 10365 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline DM B

  • Green Knight
  • Deity
  • Emperor
  • *
  • Posts: 5.210
  • Regency: 51
  • Gender: Male
    • Twilightpeaks.net - Hone of Ruins of Empire
P&H v2
« on: February 16, 2009, 09:26:31 AM »
Unfortunately there are some problems with P&H v2

Seems I manage to save some of the resolved actions for turn 61 in v2 BEFORE renaming it to 62! The damage is quite limited though; some MOC blessings that should be deleted (all blessing EXCEPT those of LPA should be removed) and a MOC rule law in Bhalaene (any holding change marked in yellow should be removed).
Logged
DM Bjørn

Offline X-DM Jon

  • Former players
  • Sovereign
  • ******
  • Posts: 1.655
  • Regency: 21
  • Gender: Male
  • Slide
Re: P&H v2
« Reply #1 on: February 16, 2009, 09:30:08 AM »
Is the MOC's #61 income affected by this?
Logged

Offline DM B

  • Green Knight
  • Deity
  • Emperor
  • *
  • Posts: 5.210
  • Regency: 51
  • Gender: Male
    • Twilightpeaks.net - Hone of Ruins of Empire
Re: P&H v2
« Reply #2 on: February 16, 2009, 10:23:14 AM »
Yes, most definitely (law 3 --> law 4 in Bhalaene); all domains with holdings in blessed provinces have increased income.
Logged
DM Bjørn

Offline X-MOC/Leman States (Even)

  • Ser Engineer
  • Former players
  • Regent
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
  • Regency: 16
  • Patriarch Leman States
Re: P&H v2
« Reply #3 on: February 16, 2009, 02:47:53 PM »
Quote from: DM Jon on February 16, 2009, 09:30:08 AM
Is the MOC's #61 income affected by this?
The income I put in the DO was based on the v1 spreadsheet, so there should not be any changes from that.

E
Logged
"We are RuinsofEmpire now, and when we act, we create our own reality."

Offline X-Elinie/RiD (Niels)

  • Former players
  • Regent
  • *****
  • Posts: 948
  • Regency: 19
  • Gender: Male
  • Formerly Star of the East
Re: P&H v2
« Reply #4 on: February 16, 2009, 04:26:39 PM »
Quote from: MOC/Leman States (Even) on February 16, 2009, 02:47:53 PM
Quote from: DM Jon on February 16, 2009, 09:30:08 AM
Is the MOC's #61 income affected by this?
The income I put in the DO was based on the v1 spreadsheet, so there should not be any changes from that.

E

Once again the lack of action triumphs over constant change!  ;D
Logged
Formerly: His Grace, Patriarch Rashid ibn Daouta, Last Imperial Duke of the Eastern Marches, Duke of Elinie, Master of Sutren Hills, Holy Paladin of Avanalae, Light of Reason.

Offline X-Bellam & BC/TB (Bobby)

  • Former players
  • Regent
  • *****
  • Posts: 639
  • Regency: 33
Re: P&H v2
« Reply #5 on: February 16, 2009, 08:51:55 PM »
Well, that explains the discrepancies Kasper noted.  Good catch.
Logged

Offline X-Haelyn's Aegis/RK (Andy)

  • Former players
  • Regent
  • *****
  • Posts: 913
  • Regency: 42
  • Gender: Male
Re: P&H v2
« Reply #6 on: February 16, 2009, 11:34:31 PM »
???  I blessed a bunch of provinces.

Prepare and cast bless land spell on:
* Sendouras 3/3 incl LPA (Elinie)
* Riverspring 1/2,  (Morcosoer)
* Shattered Hills LPA1/2, (ditto)
* Brynnor 4/4 (Mhoried)

Did the spell fail?
Logged
Robhan Khaiarén
High Marshal of Haelyn's Aegis
Work hard, walk with honour, be justly rewarded

Offline X-DM Jon

  • Former players
  • Sovereign
  • ******
  • Posts: 1.655
  • Regency: 21
  • Gender: Male
  • Slide
Re: P&H v2
« Reply #7 on: February 16, 2009, 11:40:19 PM »
We're talking about the P&H for turn 61, not 62.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »