Anathema is a Warhammer 40,000 pbp game for 4-5 players. It has very simple rules, but great depth and complexity. If focuses on a Champion of Chaos and his Warband. It is strongly influenced by Birthright .
0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
I can't recall any player actually designating a REAL heir for his domain. Naming one through decree, sure, investiture...no.
Um....I did it in turn 68 using the investiture action and it was a success, but again only for the provinces and law holdings (ie. the governorship) not guild or trade holdings (ie. the guildmaster position)
But I don't want to tweak the rule. Its is quite fine as it is.
What you should do now, after your decree, is invest you Heir with PART of your domain. I.e. if he's the Archbishop of Tuornen then you invest him with those holdings. Then later you can invest the rest, or leave it and let history play itself out - chances are good that with part of the domain already invested the heir can gather the rest behind him.
Quote from: DM Bjorn on March 24, 2011, 08:43:01 AMWhat you should do now, after your decree, is invest you Heir with PART of your domain. I.e. if he's the Archbishop of Tuornen then you invest him with those holdings. Then later you can invest the rest, or leave it and let history play itself out - chances are good that with part of the domain already invested the heir can gather the rest behind him.Would it also help to have major vassals recognise the heir ahead of time, considering that some of the lands choice is perception. Having say the CJS recognise after the WIT decree that so-and-so is the righful heir would reinforce the perception that they are heir to all rather than part of the domain.