That is an assumption that will keep the conflict rolling and tear the Conclave apart.
Not really, based on the public forum stuff I saw Wallac basically said 'pay the tithe - if you want to pay in service I will decide if it satisfies the criteria' - which is squarely in his role - the WIT told him where to stick it - they would decide whether or not to pay. I saw
zero respect from WIT
ever to anyone. They were deliberately provocative, deliberately unreasonable, and generally acted like they were above everyone else - now that may be what they really think, they're a big temple that goes in for domination, but frankly with the WIT in the Conclave, acting as they are, there
is no Conclave and the rest of us are wasting our time and money on it.
Now if they were refusing to pony up purely because they didn't think Wallac was Pontiff, and will show respect for an elected Pontiff going forward, then they have a slim excuse - the next Pontiff will find out either way and the Conclave likely stand or fall on the result.
What the WIT wants is the Conclave to stick to what it is, not be some grand centralized organisation pooling all power in the hands of one man.
I've seen nothing to suggest this as their view. They deliberately voided two key tenets of their side of the whole deal - pay the tithe, and 'show some respect for the position' - neither would have given them any inconvenience so it looks like a pure ego trip for them all the way. Whining that the Pontiff responded by treated them badly is hardly the point - any Pontiff would respond badly to a member who ignores their obligations.
If the WIT wanted to avoid 'the pontiff has the knights on a string' they could easily have proposed a '2 cardinals and pontiff must vote for the knights to send more than 'x' troops to war' rule - 2 is low enough to avoid any delay problems, but stops a potential lunatic pontiff. uite what other authority the Pontiff has beyond the moral has clearly passed me by, the WIT refused to even accept he could chair the meetings...
And you can ridicule the size of the tithe all you want, but it doesn't change the fact that, as of now, the temples of Anuire, divided and wartorn Anuire, are paying gold that equals the income of a Barony to one man, one domain, one sphere of influence.
Yes, the combined tithe is very chunky Jon; but individually, for each temple, its hardly overwhelming. Also it hardly goes to one man, it goes to 1 office, is watched by a) their domain b) the knights and c) all of us who will be able to figure out how much went to the knights. Also consider the purpose of the Conclave (at least from the Aegis viewpoint) - an army the equal of a barony is more the minimum for the purpose than the maximum... Now if Wallac had started sending the knight son his personal quests, and generally interfered in internal workings of members, then the WIT might have a point, but I saw nothing to suggest that he was.
Incidentally Caelan in particular has been flying some political points in the Conclave, particularly on this point - don't assume that I agree with everything my guys say

If that man acts erratic or doesn't show the proper respect to the myriad of conflicting interests, he will find out just how torn Anuire is. You haven't even begun to scratch the surface in this regard.
Indeed, the WIT will find out - the IHH is not the only temple likely to leave if the WIT 'Thou shalt worship me as a god vermin' Arch-Prelate takes the Pontificate role - he is far guiltier of the accusations he is throwing than Wallac ever was.