Twilightpeaks.net
RoE Development => Regent Guide => : The Dark Lily/ML August 14, 2012, 06:11:43 PM
-
Here are my rules for adjudicating the Adventure action, comments are welcome.
-
Looks familiar!
It's a handy way of dealing with minor adventures that wouldn't get played out on the forum's or by email, but for the main adventures I don't think that Bjorn's too fussed about rulesets or rolls.
-
Those sorts of random little adventures are exactly what it was intended for, when a player decides to take an Adventure action totally out of the blue, or when a Lieutenant is doing an unspecified adventure in support of a regent's action.
-
Lots of tables...is there an assumption that some adventures will not generate treasure or injury for instance?
-
Lots of tables...is there an assumption that some adventures will not generate treasure or injury for instance?
Page 2 and 3 respectively show the tables ;-)
The answer is yes, some adventures would cost more than they generated, or be a dead loss, some adventures would not generate any injury worth noting - personally I'd ignore hp damage on the assumption that it would be healed by the next action anyway, and only note "serious" injuries but that's personal choice, I don't like tracking HP of lieutenants...
The system is fairly flexible, leaving the decision of what is a good investment, what is a poor outcome, etc open, but the idea was to give players some idea of what they could expect. There was a reasonable amount of comment when it was discussed on BR.net.
-
Looks promising.
It would be ideal to have some sot of framework beyond the single DAC to resolve minor adventures.
-
The HP bit is there because it was written for a table top game, not PBEM. I f you like it Bjorn (or anybody else for that matter) feel free to use it or to tinker with it .