RoE Archive > The Strategy Without (OoC)

P&H 161 — Comments/Questions

<< < (3/3)

X-Points East:

--- Quote from: Talinie & NIT/TD (Linde) on December 07, 2013, 11:58:59 PM ---Ignore my last post.

Your view on collections does have some merit when people want to backstab each other. So instead of challenging your way of viewing collections I would rather suggest this:
Rename "Total Income" to "Modified Income"
Rename "Net Income" to "Total Income"
Rename "Net RP Collection" to "Total RP Collection"
Rename "Fixed Grants" to "Planned Outgoing Grants"

These changes are suggested to avoid confusion about what the cells reflect.

--- End quote ---

I have made some alterations to the terminology in the MASTER sheet.  See Re: P&H 161 — Comments/Questions for some examples.

X-Points East:

--- Quote from: Stjordvik Traders/SH (Tristan) on December 07, 2013, 10:14:53 AM ---
--- Quote from: Talinie & NIT/TD (Linde) on December 07, 2013, 07:48:43 AM ---It doesn't seem to make sense to assume that you receive RP from vassals while assuming that RP you send to a liege is only potentially spent... Also. Last turns regency income is hardly relevant.
Either make a "regency potentially gained" as well as a RP potentially spent. Or include both in net collection and make notes when vassals rebel.

--- End quote ---
What Linde said, with regency being semi mystical it doesn't make sense that you get it and then choose to pay it on (you need a spell for that). But rather that the vassalage siphons it off as it is being collected.

--- End quote ---

In the MASTER sheet, many figures indicate previous-turn resolution; however, figures for RP Spend, GB Spend, and Domain Upkeep indicate potential current-turn expenditures and are relevant to preparation of current-turn domain orders.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page