RoE Archive > The Strategy Without (OoC)

P&H 161 — Comments/Questions

(1/3) > >>

X-Points East:
A Topic for Comments/Questions on P&H 161

Stjordvik Traders/SH (Tristan):
The equation under the tax column that indicates how much prosperity change can be ignored is based on total law rather than law that is willing to work with the province owner.

Everyone has heavy tax, with average prosperity - I assume that this will change and is just a placeholder.

Regency vassalage seems to come out of RP collection before the bloodline score cap is applied.

Caelcoruinn, AERENWE has no manor holdings.

Nuoltiém Barden has 2 different bloodline scores listed (Major 31/Minor 18).

X-Points East:

--- Quote from: Stjordvik Traders/SH (Tristan) on December 04, 2013, 10:30:27 PM ---Regency vassalage seems to come out of RP collection before the bloodline score cap is applied.

--- End quote ---

In the MASTER sheet, RP Collection indicates RP already collected; RP Spend indicates RP potentially to be spent.

In the MASTER sheet, GB Collection indicates GB already collected; GB Spend and Domain Upkeep indicate GB potentially to be spent.

X-Points East:

--- Quote from: Stjordvik Traders/SH (Tristan) on December 04, 2013, 10:30:27 PM ---Nuoltiém Barden has 2 different bloodline scores listed (Major 31/Minor 18).

--- End quote ---

Fixed.

Stjordvik Traders/SH (Tristan):

--- Quote from: X-Points East on December 06, 2013, 12:45:27 AM ---OoC:

In the MASTER sheet, Net RP Collection indicates RP already collected; RP Spend indicates RP potentially to be spent.

In the MASTER sheet, Net Income indicates GB already collected; Fixed Grants and Domain Upkeep indicate GB potentially to be spent.

--- End quote ---

Net RP Collection however includes RP gained from vassalage but does not include RP spent due to vassalage. It may be a concept issue but I always understood that RP vassalage expenditure was automatic unless you took an action to end the vassalage.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version